Thursday, 08 June 2006
US Allowed Zarqawi to Escape
Don't get me wrong, I'm all about today's mandatory "Yay USA!" cheer, but I still don't understand why we didn't stop this guy when we had the chance:
The United States deliberately passed up repeated opportunities to kill the head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Jordanian-born terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, before the March 2003 US-led invasion of that country.[...]
Mr Scheuer was a CIA agent for 22 years - six of them as head of the agency's Osama bin Laden unit - until he resigned in 2004.
He told Four Corners that during 2002, the Bush Administration received detailed intelligence about Zarqawi's training camp in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Mr Scheuer claims that a July 2002 plan to destroy the camp lapsed because "it was more important not to give the Europeans the impression we were gunslingers".
"Mr Bush had Zarqawi in his sights almost every day for a year before the invasion of Iraq and he didn't shoot because they were wining and dining the French in an effort to get them to assist us in the invasion of Iraq," he told Four Corners.
"Almost every day we sent a package to the White House that had overhead imagery of the house he was staying in. It was a terrorist training camp . . . experimenting with ricin and anthrax . . . any collateral damage there would have been terrorists."
And here's a CNN report about the time the Iraqi army captured Al-Qaeda's Second In Command© but then let him go because 'they didn't know who he was':
Iraqi security forces caught the most wanted man in the country last year, but released him because they didn't know who he was, the Iraqi deputy minister of interior said Thursday.Hussain Kamal confirmed that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi -- the al Qaeda in Iraq leader who has a $25 million bounty on his head -- was in custody at some point last year, but he wouldn't provide further details.
A U.S. official couldn't confirm the report, but said he wouldn't dismiss it.
"It is plausible," he said.
And finally, here's the good professor Juan Cole weighing in on the fact that none of this really matters all that much at all:
There is no evidence of operational links between [Zarqawi's] Salafi Jihadis in Iraq and the real al-Qaeda; it was just a sort of branding that suited everyone, including the US. Official US spokesmen have all along over-estimated his importance. Leaders are significant and not always easily replaced. But Zarqawi has in my view has been less important than local Iraqi leaders and groups. I don't expect the guerrilla war to subside any time soon.
Hopefully he's wrong.
Posted by flow Frazao on June 8, 2006 at 01:10 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Wednesday, 07 June 2006
CIA Spider Web
Here's a pretty striking image of the 'spider-web' the US has woven of illegal detentions and transfers, with collusion of Council of Europe member states:
Posted by flow Frazao on June 7, 2006 at 08:26 PM in America, Current Affairs, Iraq, Scary Bush, War on Terra | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Saturday, 28 January 2006
Iraq and Wire-tapping
Who would've thought that the Iraqis would wind up with more freedom than Americans (at least on paper):
"The freedom of communication, and mail, telegraphic, electronic, and telephonic correspondence, and other correspondence shall be guaranteed and may not be monitored, wiretapped or disclosed except for legal and security necessity and by a judicial decision."
Hopefully their government will be better at upholding their constitution than King George has done with ours.
Posted by flow Frazao on January 28, 2006 at 11:38 AM in America, Iraq, Scary Bush | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Thursday, 12 January 2006
Food for the Ears
Some stuff I've been listening to that's worth mentioning:
- The Beastles - dj BC presents The Beatles vs. The Beastie Boys (follow link for mp3s)
- Live From Iraq - 4th25
It took only a few ambushes, roadside bombs and corpses for Neal Saunders to know what he had to do: turn the streets of Baghdad into rap music. So the First Cavalry sergeant, then newly arrived for a year of duty in Sadr City, began hoarding his monthly paychecks and seeking out a U.S. supplier willing to ship a keyboard, digital mixer, cable, microphones and headphones to an overseas military address. He hammered together a plywood shack, tacked up some cheap mattress pads for soundproofing and invited other Task Force 112 members to join him in his jerry-built studio. They call themselves "4th25"—pronounced fourth quarter, like the final do-or-die minutes of a game—and their album is "Live From Iraq." The sound may be raw, even by rap standards, but it expresses things that soldiers usually keep bottled up. "You can't call home and tell your mom your door got blown off by an IED," says Saunders. "No one talks about what we're going through. Sure, there are generals on the TV, but they're not speaking for us. We're venting for everybody."
Watch their video here, if you can stand it. Not a film clip for the meek, which is why it probably won't get much play on MTV. And that's a shame, because these guys are to Iraq what Jimi Hendrix was to Vietnam.
Posted by flow Frazao on January 12, 2006 at 10:19 PM in Culture, Iraq, Music, War on Terra | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Wednesday, 09 March 2005
Ultima Ratio Regum
Ex-Sgt. Nadim Abou Rabeh, of Lebanese descent, was quoted in the Saudi daily al-Medina Wednesday as saying Saddam was actually captured Friday, Dec. 12, 2003, and not the day after, as announced by the U.S. Army.
"I was among the 20-man unit, including eight of Arab descent, who searched for Saddam for three days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and we found him in a modest home in a small village and not in a hole as announced," Abou Rabeh said.
Unidentified White House official
Quoted by Ron Suskind in the New York Times Magazine
October 17, 2004
Posted by flow Frazao on March 9, 2005 at 03:08 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Tuesday, 15 February 2005
White House To American POWs: "Don't be so greedy."
What, you thought the Bush Administration couldn't get any more asinine?
The Bush administration is fighting the former prisoners of war in court, trying to prevent them from collecting nearly $1 billion from Iraq that a federal judge awarded them as compensation for their torture at the hands of Saddam Hussein's regime.
The rationale: Today's Iraqis are good guys, and they need the money.
Who will win in the battle of the US Government vs. American War Heroes? No one knows, but the "compassionate conservatives" in the Bush administration sure have an interesting angle:
Besides, what do they need money for? They'll have their private social security funds to keep them in the lap of luxury for the rest of their lives.
Won't they?
Posted by flow Frazao on February 15, 2005 at 08:09 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Is It Drafty In Here?
Or is it just me?
...
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, in an Op-Ed blaming "conspiracy mongers" for "attempting to scare and mislead young Americans," insisted that "the idea of reinstating the draft has never been debated, endorsed, discussed, theorized, pondered or even whispered by anyone in the Bush administration."
That assertion is demonstrably false. According to an internal Selective Service memo made public under the Freedom of Information Act, the agency's acting director met with two of Rumsfeld's undersecretaries in February 2003 precisely to debate, discuss and ponder a return to the draft. The memo duly notes the administration's aversion to a draft but adds, "Defense manpower officials concede there are critical shortages of military personnel with certain special skills, such as medical personnel, linguists, computer network engineers, etc." The potentially prohibitive cost of "attracting and retaining such personnel for military service," the memo adds, has led "some officials to conclude that, while a conventional draft may never be needed, a draft of men and women possessing these critical skills may be warranted in a future crisis." This new draft, it suggests, could be invoked to meet the needs of both the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security.
The memo then proposes, in detail, that the Selective Service be "re-engineered" to cover all Americans -- "men and (for the first time) women" -- ages eighteen to thirty-four. In addition to name, date of birth and Social Security number, young adults would have to provide the agency with details of their specialized skills on an ongoing basis until they passed out of draft jeopardy at age thirty-five. Testifying before Congress two weeks after the meeting, acting director of Selective Service Lewis Brodsky acknowledged that "consultations with senior Defense manpower officials" have spurred the agency to shift its preparations away from a full-scale, Vietnam-style draft of untrained men "to a draft of smaller numbers of critical-skills personnel."
Richard Flahavan, spokesman for Selective Service, tells Rolling Stone that preparing for a skills-based draft is "in fact what we have been doing." For starters, the agency has updated a plan to draft nurses and doctors. But that's not all. "Our thinking was that if we could run a health-care draft in the future," Flahavan says, "then with some very slight tinkering we could change that skill to plumbers or linguists or electrical engineers or whatever the military was short." In other words, if Uncle Sam decides he needs people with your skills, Selective Service has the means to draft you -- and quick.
There will never be another Vietnam-style draft. The Masters of War and much smarter this time around. Now, when the US Army needs troops Congress will pass a bill called The Anti-Draft Measure For Patriotic American Servicemen and Women and people will start getting letters requesting their presence for Non-mandatory Compulsory Physicals.
And why not? It worked with the Clear Skies Bill, the Healthy Forests Initiative and the Patriot Act.
![](http://www.fracturednews.com/FN-images/911%20testimony%20images/rumsfeld.jpg)
Posted by flow Frazao on February 15, 2005 at 07:38 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Tuesday, 11 January 2005
Support Our Death Squads
Our tax dollars at work, folks:
Raymond Bonner
Weakness and Deceit
June, 1984
One military source involved in the Pentagon debate . . . suggests that new offensive operations are needed that would create a fear of aiding the insurgency. "The Sunni population is paying no price for the support it is giving to the terrorists," he said. "From their point of view, it is cost-free. We have to change that equation."
Newsweek
‘The Salvador Option’
January 9, 2005
Billmon's got much, much more.
Posted by flow Frazao on January 11, 2005 at 07:36 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Monday, 01 November 2004
Deputy Governor of Baghdad Killed in Drive-By Shooting
Iraq is great. Our policy is great. Don't change horses in the middle of quicksand. War is peace. Ignorance is strength. It's hard work. Stay the course.
Hatim Kamil was assassinated in a drive-by shooting, said Baghdad Governor Ali al-Haidari. He had no other details.
Interior Ministry spokesman Col. Adnan Abdul-Rahman said Kamil was killed when gunmen opened fire on his car in the southern Doura neighborhood. Two of his bodyguards were also wounded in the attack, Abdul-Rahman said.
Insurgents have killed dozens of Iraqi politicians and government workers in recent months in a bid to destabilize the country's reconstruction.
Posted by flow Frazao on November 1, 2004 at 07:08 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Monday, 25 October 2004
380 Tons Of Incompetence
This is absurd. How many of these fuckups does it take to convince the American public that George W. Bush is making us less safe:
Melissa Fleming, spokeswoman for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CNN the interim Iraqi government reported several days ago that the explosives were missing from the Al Qaqaa complex, south of Baghdad.
The explosives -- considered powerful enough to demolish buildings or detonate nuclear warheads -- were under IAEA control until the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. IAEA workers left the country before the fighting began."
This is not some tiny mistake. We're not talking about a couple of sticks of dynamite. This stuff is incredibly powerful:
Less than a pound! For the mathematically challenged, that means over 760,000 Pan Am Flight 103 bombs. It's an incredible amount of weaponry, and it looks like the terrorists have hit the jackpot thanks to the Bush Administration.
Just in case things are still unclear, here's Scott McClellan discussing priorities at this morning's press gaggle:
MR. McCLELLAN: At the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom there were a number of priorities. It was a priority to make sure that the oil fields were secure, so that there wasn't massive destruction of the oil fields, which we thought would occur. It was a priority to get the reconstruction office up and running. It was a priority to secure the various ministries, so that we could get those ministries working on their priorities, whether it was -
Q So it was the multinational force's responsibility --
MR. McCLELLAN: There were a number of -- well, the coalition forces, there were a number of priorities at the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom."
There you have it. In the Bush administration, protecting the oil was (and is) a higher priority than securing 380 tons of the most powerful conventional weaponry on the planet.
UPDATE: This report from CNN does not bode well for anyone:
On an APTN video monitored by CNN, a masked gunman read a statement promising a counterpunch against U.S., Iraqi and multinational targets throughout Iraq "in the ways and forms of our choosing."
Posted by flow Frazao on October 25, 2004 at 06:10 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Wednesday, 20 October 2004
Delusional
A rare glimpse into the mind of George W. Bush:
"You remember Mark Twain said, 'He looks like a contented Christian with four aces.' I mean he was just sitting there like, 'I'm on top of the world,' " Robertson said on the CNN show, "Paula Zahn Now."
"And I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, 'Mr. President, you had better prepare the American people for casualties.' "
Robertson said the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties."
A war with no casualties? Is he even familiar with the concept of reality? I suppose this sort of idiocy should be expected from a man who would rather go to war than raise twins.
Andrew Sullivan sums the situation up pretty well:
Posted by flow Frazao on October 20, 2004 at 11:03 AM in Iraq, ReDefeat Bush | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Delusional Part II
By September.
Of 2003.
Posted by flow Frazao on October 20, 2004 at 12:12 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Thursday, 14 October 2004
Hearts and Minds
The latest from Seymore Hersh (the Pulitzer prize winning reporter who broke Abu Ghraib and My Lai):
It was a call about this. He had been bivouacing outside of town with his platoon. It was near, it was an agricultural area, and there was a granary around. And the guys that owned the granary, the Iraqis that owned the granary... It was an area that the insurgency had some control, but it was very quiet, it was not Fallujah. It was a town that was off the mainstream. Not much violence there. And his guys, the guys that owned the granary, had hired, my guess is from his language, I wasn't explicit -- we're talking not more than three dozen, thirty or so guards. Any kind of work people were dying to do. So Iraqis were guarding the granary. His troops were bivouaced, they were stationed there, they got to know everybody...
They were a couple weeks together, they knew each other. So orders came down from the generals in Baghdad, we want to clear the village, like in Samarra. And as he told the story, another platoon from his company came and executed all the guards, as his people were screaming, stop. And he said they just shot them one by one. He went nuts, and his soldiers went nuts. And he's hysterical. He's totally hysterical. And he went to the captain. He was a lieutenant, he went to the company captain. And the company captain said, "No, you don't understand. That's a kill. We got thirty-six insurgents."
You read those stories where the Americans, we take a city, we had a combat, a hundred and fifteen insurgents are killed. You read those stories. It's shades of Vietnam again, folks, body counts...
You know what I told him? I said, fella, I said: you've complained to the captain. He knows you think they committed murder. Your troops know their fellow soldiers committed murder. Shut up. Just shut up. Get through your tour and just shut up. You're going to get a bullet in the back. You don't need that. And that's where we are with this war."
Watch the video here.
Posted by flow Frazao on October 14, 2004 at 12:00 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Thursday, 07 October 2004
Not Again
Fuck. I hope this isn't true.
If it is, we are so fucked.
Posted by flow Frazao on October 7, 2004 at 05:52 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Right On Time
Something tells me the results of the long awaited CIA report on Iraqi WMDs weren't exactly what George Bush had in mind last June:
THE PRESIDENT: Right, no -- Bob, it's a good question. I don't know -- I haven't reached a final conclusion yet because the inspectors -- inspection teams aren't back yet. I do know that Saddam Hussein had the capacity to make weapons. I do know he's a dangerous person. I know he used weapons against his own people and against the neighborhood. But we'll wait until Charlie gets back with the final report, and then I'll be glad to report. "
Conveniently enough there's a major Presidential debate tomorrow night, at which George Bush can gladly report that he was totally and completely wrong.
Again.
Posted by flow Frazao on October 7, 2004 at 05:03 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
Saturday, 02 October 2004
Iraq Burns, Bush Reaches For Fiddle
This private letter from an Iraqi war correspondent tells the story of an Iraq that's much different from the one our President has been describing:
What they mean by situation is this: the Iraqi government doesn't control most Iraqi cities, there are several car bombs going off each day around the country killing and injuring scores of innocent people, the country's roads are becoming impassable and littered by hundreds of
landmines and explosive devices aimed to kill American soldiers, there are assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings. The situation, basically, means a raging barbaric guerilla war. In four days, 110 people died and over 300 got injured in Baghdad alone. The numbers are so shocking that the ministry of health -- which was attempting an exercise of public transparency by releasing the numbers -- has now stopped disclosing them.
Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day.
A friend drove thru the Shiite slum of Sadr City yesterday. He said young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices into the ground. They melt a shallow hole into the asphalt, dig the explosive, cover it with dirt and put an old tire or plastic can over it to signal to the locals this is booby-trapped. He said on the main roads of Sadr City, there were a dozen landmines per every ten yards. His car snaked and swirled to avoid driving over them. Behind the walls sits an angry Iraqi ready to detonate them as soon as an American convoy gets near. This is in Shiite land, the population that was supposed to love America for liberating Iraq.
And Bush continues to insist that elections in Iraq are the light at the end of the tunnel. He's simply not dealing with reality.
Even one of Bush's top advisment companies, Kroll, Inc, has been telling its clients worldwide that one of its clients, Bush, is misleading the world about the prospects for holding an Iraqi election in January, and is doing it to win the U.S. election in November.
Their latest report, dated yesterday, September 30, says what we all know, that the emperor has no clothes:
George Bush has absolutely no idea what's going on in Iraq. It's shocking, really.
Posted by flow Frazao on October 2, 2004 at 10:55 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Sunday, 19 September 2004
Finally Some Sanity
At long last, some REAL Republicans are trying to talk some sense into the President:
In appearances on news talk shows, Republican senators also urged Bush to be more open with the American public after the disclosure of a classified CIA report that gave a gloomy outlook for Iraq and raised the possibility of civil war.
"The fact is, we're in deep trouble in Iraq ... and I think we're going to have to look at some recalibration of policy," Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"We made serious mistakes," said Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican who has campaigned at Bush's side this year after patching up a bitter rivalry.
[...]
Sen. Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also criticized the administration's handling of Iraq's reconstruction.
Only $1 billion of $18.4 billion allocated by Congress for the task has been spent, Lugar said. "This is the incompetence in the administration," he said on ABC's "This Week."
Posted by flow Frazao on September 19, 2004 at 06:39 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Friday, 30 July 2004
Iraqi Attacks on Ammunition Stockpile
I found this video posted at Information Clearinghouse, which is not what I would term a reliable resource. It's interesting reading, but unless I can find the material there verified by at least one other source, I tend to doubt it's credibility.
After a bit of poking around I managed to dig up this pdf from NATO which verifies the attack:
A suspected Katyusha rocket hit the ammunition dump of the Kirkuk US Air Base at around 9:30 p.m. on Wednesday night, starting fires and causing a chain reaction of explosions. Thick clouds of smoke covered nearly the entire city. The fires were put out at about 5 a.m. on Thursday morning.
There were no casualties on the base, but the explosions caused damage across a wide area, shattering windows and damaging cars. Some of the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps garrison vehicles were damaged by flying debris about 1.5 km (1 mile) from where the ammunition was stored.
It's so rare to see unfiltered video straight from Iraq. It's gotten to the point where I've grown so used to seeing sanitized clips accompanied by the constant ramblings of morons from CNN that when I see something untouched and unedited it seems almost surreal.
![](kirkukAmmoExplosion.jpg)
(Click image to watch)
To download this video, right click here and choose "Save As".
Posted by flow Frazao on July 30, 2004 at 12:11 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Tuesday, 27 July 2004
A Soldier Responds to Michael Moore
Last weekend Fahrenheit 9/11 crossed the $100 million mark. Impressive totals, but it's not all cream cheese and jelly. There are a few people who aren't exactly thrilled by the movie:
Posted by SmooveJ Zao on July 27, 2004 at 09:23 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Friday, 16 July 2004
The Worst Is the Soundtrack of the Boys Shrieking
About a week ago, Tom Tomorrow did a report on (hold your breath) children at Abu Ghraib. According to a German TV news program, the International Red Cross found at least 107 children in coaliton-administered detention centers in Iraq.
When I first read it, I was skeptical, because I hadn't heard of it anywhere else. However, today I came across an article describing Norway's reaction to the child abuse:
As a reaction to the alleged torture of children, Norwegian authorities state they will address the US both politically and diplomatically and clearly state that it is not tolerated.
"Such assaults are unacceptable," said Odd Jostein Sæter, parliamentary secretary at the Prime Minister’s Office, to the Norwegian television channel NRK. "It is against international laws and it is also unacceptable from a moral point of view. This is why we react strongly, as we already have reacted to the abuse which is documented at the prisons in Iraq."
He said that Norwegian authorities will use its first possible opportunity to respond to the Americans actions both politically and diplomatically. He stressed that jailing and assaulting children will not be tolerated.
This is beyond bad. Not only are we about to lose yet another ally over this, but just try and imagine what the reaction is going to be around the world when the news breaks big.
And it will break BIG.
Sy Hersh (the guy who reported the original Abu Ghraib story the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, among many others) is saying things are far worse than anything we've seen so far:
There is a video of Hersh addressing the ACLU here. He begins at about 1hr 8min in, but Ed Cone provides us with a short synopsis:
"The worst is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking," the reporter told an ACLU convention last week. Hersh says there was "a massive amount of criminal wrongdoing that was covered up at the highest command out there, and higher." ...
Words fail me. I really don't know what else to say. Will frat hazing be the explanation for this as well?
Posted by flow Frazao on July 16, 2004 at 03:45 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Flowers for Lila Lipscomb
Patriotboy spins this tale of a business with it's heart in the right place:
The florist is The Organic Bouquet. If you're sending flowers, this is a golden opportunity to support a business with good politics.
Posted by SmooveJ Zao on July 16, 2004 at 08:05 AM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Tuesday, 13 July 2004
Passing the Buck part XXVII
There's been a lot of talk over the past few days blaming the CIA for screwing up intelligence during the rush to war:
Following release of the findings of a yearlong inquiry by the Senate Intelligence Committee, the panel's Republican chairman said Congress might not have approved the Iraq war had lawmakers known the truth.
[...]
The report, which was highly critical of departing Director George Tenet, said the CIA kept key information from its own and other agencies' analysts, engaged in "group think" by failing to challenge the assumption that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and allowed President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell to make false statements."
The Senate report is a blatant attempt to absolve the Bush administration of responsibility for hyping the WMD threat from Iraq. Blaming the CIA is the easy way out, and the false pretenses and phony data were not the sole work of the CIA – President Bush and his entire national security team are to blame as well.
This article, from October 11, 2002, describes the "unrelenting pressure" on the CIA to come up with evidence supporting the case for war:
In what sources described as an escalating "war," top officials at the Pentagon and elsewhere have bombarded CIA analysts with criticism and calls for revisions on such key questions as whether Iraq has ties to the Al Qaeda terrorist network, sources said.
The sources stressed that CIA analysts—who are supposed to be impartial—are fighting to resist the pressure. But they said analysts are increasingly resentful of what they perceive as efforts to contaminate the intelligence process.
"Analysts feel more politicized and more pushed than many of them can ever remember," said an intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"The guys at the Pentagon shriek on issues such as the link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. There has been a lot of pressure to write on this constantly, and to not let it drop."
[...]
Intelligence sources say the pressure on CIA analysts has been unrelenting in recent months, much of it coming from Iraq hawks including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his top deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz.
CIA officials who brief Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz on Iraq routinely return to the agency with a long list of complaints and demands for new analysis or shifts in emphasis, sources said.
"There is a lot of unhappiness with the analysis," usually because it is seen as not hard-line enough, one intelligence official said.
Another government official said CIA briefers "are constantly sent back by the senior people at Defense and other places to get more, get more, get more to make their case."
Obviously, the CIA is partly to blame for the egregious intelligence failures. However, this is NOT the end of the story. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and the rest of the White House staff should not be absolved of resposibility. They stood over the shoulders of analysts and instructed them step-by-step.
The CIA may have lied about intelligence, but they did it because they were ordered to by George Bush and his cronies.
Posted by flow Frazao on July 13, 2004 at 03:18 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Friday, 09 July 2004
Trump Slams Bush On Iraq
If only The Donald could fire him:
"What was the purpose of the whole thing?" Donald Trump asks in an Esquire interview. "Hundreds of young people killed. And what about the people coming back with no arms and no legs?"
Posted by flow Frazao on July 9, 2004 at 12:19 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack
Wednesday, 02 June 2004
Kidnappers target, torture Iraq's best doctors
Already plagued by outdated equipment and drug shortages, Iraq's fragile health-care system is buckling under this new security threat. Some doctors who have not been kidnapped have fled Iraq - just as the nation most needs their help. "We are losing the brain power of our most brilliant doctors," said Dr. Sami Salman, internist and medical director at the Special Care hospital at Baghdad's Medical City health-care complex. "You can't just replace these people overnight."
Ransom, it seems, is not the only motivation for the crimes. In many cases, abductors have ordered the physicians to leave Iraq, sometimes setting a deadline. Iraqi officials fear that the abductions and threats are an organized attempt to cripple the country's healthcare network, likening the tactics to terrorist attacks on the country's oil pipelines or electricity plants. "These are not purely thieves," said Dr. Amir Kuzaii, deputy health minister. "These people have different aims. They are professionals. They want to paralyze the basic functions of the country."
Posted by flow Frazao on June 2, 2004 at 04:45 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Monday, 24 May 2004
It's About Time
Finally, someone has taken some decisive action regarding the Abu Ghraib prison torture. Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, has implemented a policy that is sure to stem the tide of pictures coming out of Iraq.
He has banned cameras from US military compounds:
Quoting a Pentagon source, the paper said the US Defence Department believes that some of the damning photos of US soldiers abusing Iraqis at Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad were taken with camera phones.
"Digital cameras, camcorders and cellphones with cameras have been prohibited in military compounds in Iraq," it said, adding that a "total ban throughout the US military" is in the works.
Problem solved.
Posted by flow Frazao on May 24, 2004 at 04:47 PM in Iraq | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack