Tuesday, 13 July 2004
Passing the Buck part XXVII
There's been a lot of talk over the past few days blaming the CIA for screwing up intelligence during the rush to war:
Following release of the findings of a yearlong inquiry by the Senate Intelligence Committee, the panel's Republican chairman said Congress might not have approved the Iraq war had lawmakers known the truth.
[...]
The report, which was highly critical of departing Director George Tenet, said the CIA kept key information from its own and other agencies' analysts, engaged in "group think" by failing to challenge the assumption that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and allowed President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell to make false statements."
The Senate report is a blatant attempt to absolve the Bush administration of responsibility for hyping the WMD threat from Iraq. Blaming the CIA is the easy way out, and the false pretenses and phony data were not the sole work of the CIA – President Bush and his entire national security team are to blame as well.
This article, from October 11, 2002, describes the "unrelenting pressure" on the CIA to come up with evidence supporting the case for war:
In what sources described as an escalating "war," top officials at the Pentagon and elsewhere have bombarded CIA analysts with criticism and calls for revisions on such key questions as whether Iraq has ties to the Al Qaeda terrorist network, sources said.
The sources stressed that CIA analysts—who are supposed to be impartial—are fighting to resist the pressure. But they said analysts are increasingly resentful of what they perceive as efforts to contaminate the intelligence process.
"Analysts feel more politicized and more pushed than many of them can ever remember," said an intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"The guys at the Pentagon shriek on issues such as the link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. There has been a lot of pressure to write on this constantly, and to not let it drop."
[...]
Intelligence sources say the pressure on CIA analysts has been unrelenting in recent months, much of it coming from Iraq hawks including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his top deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz.
CIA officials who brief Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz on Iraq routinely return to the agency with a long list of complaints and demands for new analysis or shifts in emphasis, sources said.
"There is a lot of unhappiness with the analysis," usually because it is seen as not hard-line enough, one intelligence official said.
Another government official said CIA briefers "are constantly sent back by the senior people at Defense and other places to get more, get more, get more to make their case."
Obviously, the CIA is partly to blame for the egregious intelligence failures. However, this is NOT the end of the story. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and the rest of the White House staff should not be absolved of resposibility. They stood over the shoulders of analysts and instructed them step-by-step.
The CIA may have lied about intelligence, but they did it because they were ordered to by George Bush and his cronies.
Posted by flow Frazao on July 13, 2004 at 03:18 PM in Iraq | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/919015
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Passing the Buck part XXVII: